belvdr
Mar 17, 08:57 AM
Reminds me of people predicting flying cars in the year 2010. Hilarious when the guy sets the phone down and the kids drag the video screen over to them. Now the glass is one big camera. That could be scary.
I can also see a vast run on Windex.
I can also see a vast run on Windex.
BillyBobBongo
Oct 4, 03:54 AM
Talk about a punt. This has to be for a show car....right?
That's a tough one. You'd think it was...but since it's so ugly you'd hope that it wasn't.
That's a tough one. You'd think it was...but since it's so ugly you'd hope that it wasn't.
Dreadnought
Aug 15, 08:20 AM
use te script of mc68k. You set it up once, and never notice or see it! Look in the FAQ for the link/to download his app.
yellow
Sep 12, 10:47 AM
That could be quite a challenging philosophical statement.
Ah! True! In this case, I will put it down as poor translation from my native tongue.
Ah! True! In this case, I will put it down as poor translation from my native tongue.
TheDance511
Feb 14, 11:14 PM
:apple: Wow..... You guys are SO supportive..Good story man :) :apple:
codymac
Mar 3, 03:58 PM
most countries that print out pieces of paper for us to use as currency is this property of that government.
*squint*
I see what you did there.
Taken to eleven: since most assets are collateralized, I guess there not technically the owners' either.
*squint*
I see what you did there.
Taken to eleven: since most assets are collateralized, I guess there not technically the owners' either.
mjteix
Apr 5, 09:50 AM
I really don't think Apple will update the Air's with Sandy Bridge.
Here is why, the high resolution display (1440X900) will make the Intel graphics a major downgrade from the 320m in performance. I think the Air will get updated with the next MBP update (2012) and the 13" MBP and MBA become one with Ivy processors. Also at this time I expect the 15" and 17" MBP's to become "Air" like with SSD storage, thinner, and lighter.
I was holding out for the update, but came to this conclusion and made my purchase, which I couldn't be more satisfied with.
I may be wrong, but I would rather have the 320m if they do update it, the Thunderbolt is what will hurt if you use external drives..
So Intel's graphics are good enough for the 13" MBP that can support an external 30" display, but not for the MBA? Most LV/ULV Sandy Bridge cpus have the same HD3000 graphics as regular Core i5/i7 cpus used in the MBP. Sure they are clocked slightly lower, but it is probably already the case for the 320M.
I don't see how Thunderbolt will hurt for external drives. If anything you'll get access to faster drives (RAID HDD, SSD (http://www.lacie.com/us/products/product.htm?id=10549)) it's better than what you can today with only USB2 ports.
Here is why, the high resolution display (1440X900) will make the Intel graphics a major downgrade from the 320m in performance. I think the Air will get updated with the next MBP update (2012) and the 13" MBP and MBA become one with Ivy processors. Also at this time I expect the 15" and 17" MBP's to become "Air" like with SSD storage, thinner, and lighter.
I was holding out for the update, but came to this conclusion and made my purchase, which I couldn't be more satisfied with.
I may be wrong, but I would rather have the 320m if they do update it, the Thunderbolt is what will hurt if you use external drives..
So Intel's graphics are good enough for the 13" MBP that can support an external 30" display, but not for the MBA? Most LV/ULV Sandy Bridge cpus have the same HD3000 graphics as regular Core i5/i7 cpus used in the MBP. Sure they are clocked slightly lower, but it is probably already the case for the 320M.
I don't see how Thunderbolt will hurt for external drives. If anything you'll get access to faster drives (RAID HDD, SSD (http://www.lacie.com/us/products/product.htm?id=10549)) it's better than what you can today with only USB2 ports.
Chupa Chupa
Sep 13, 06:19 AM
Why don't they just put a HDMI socket on a Mac Mini? This would let you use Front Row on your flat screen TV, this gives you the option of DVD's, USB TV cards (and video recording), etc
1) The mini is 2x as expensive as iTV
2) The mini would cost even more with HDMI (at least right now)
3) A lot of consumers just want the simplicity of a set-top box.
4) Others don't want to waste the power of a full computer just as a media center.
1) The mini is 2x as expensive as iTV
2) The mini would cost even more with HDMI (at least right now)
3) A lot of consumers just want the simplicity of a set-top box.
4) Others don't want to waste the power of a full computer just as a media center.
ijurachi
Jan 22, 12:44 PM
LG-Philips is the current provider of LCD panels for the ACDs. I found this press release on the LG-Philips corporate site:
To meet the growing need for high-quality LCD panels in the desktop monitor market for graphic design and video production uses, LG.Philips LCD has developed wider color gamut products, including the world�s largest monitor panel, measuring 30 inches diagonally, as well as a 26-inch model. Both panels boast superior color gamut of 117 percent.
Maybe a refresh isn't too far away. Personally, I think the design and size for the 30" will not change but the performance will see a boost.
My 2�
To meet the growing need for high-quality LCD panels in the desktop monitor market for graphic design and video production uses, LG.Philips LCD has developed wider color gamut products, including the world�s largest monitor panel, measuring 30 inches diagonally, as well as a 26-inch model. Both panels boast superior color gamut of 117 percent.
Maybe a refresh isn't too far away. Personally, I think the design and size for the 30" will not change but the performance will see a boost.
My 2�
jsw
Oct 4, 10:54 AM
gentle reminder of how many patents we have seen come and go without anything coming of it.
Indeed. Often patents are filed defensively to prevent others from taking a good idea, even if the patent holder opts not to develop a product.
I hope we get what we all think we're getting, but we've been mislead before....
Indeed. Often patents are filed defensively to prevent others from taking a good idea, even if the patent holder opts not to develop a product.
I hope we get what we all think we're getting, but we've been mislead before....
cootersgarage6
Feb 6, 11:50 AM
I miss the old Apple... The Apple that had the great, funny commercials. And also the fun to watch commercials. I remember these, they were the BEST. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jN3RU8pJR74
So why don't they make these anymore?
So why don't they make these anymore?
AppleIntelRock
Oct 26, 08:34 PM
Am I the only person around here who doesn't see an issue with scratches on this (or for that matter the current iPods)?
[parts omitted for brevity]
Feels better to me. If it affected viewing in some way I would understand, but it really doesn't?
I disagree completely, scratches interfere with almost every aspect of the ipod's screen. They make the overall viewing very unpleasant, especially if left with no case for very long periods of time. Some ipods become almost illegible because of the high amount of scratches, as a result I think cases are totally necessary.
How about we reserve our comments on usability, interface and one-handed-ness until we see a demo... or a freaking production model for that matter.
sheesh. You all talk like you've used it.
-Clive
P.S. SiliconAddict: the above comments are not made solely at you.
Chiffon Girls Party Dress
Free Shipping girls wool dress
Party Dresses for Girls
girls party dresses(Pakistan)
Girls Christmas Dresses
Party Wear Dresses For
Party Wear Dresses For Girls
[parts omitted for brevity]
Feels better to me. If it affected viewing in some way I would understand, but it really doesn't?
I disagree completely, scratches interfere with almost every aspect of the ipod's screen. They make the overall viewing very unpleasant, especially if left with no case for very long periods of time. Some ipods become almost illegible because of the high amount of scratches, as a result I think cases are totally necessary.
How about we reserve our comments on usability, interface and one-handed-ness until we see a demo... or a freaking production model for that matter.
sheesh. You all talk like you've used it.
-Clive
P.S. SiliconAddict: the above comments are not made solely at you.
Platform
Oct 26, 07:27 AM
Hmm...hope the real thing turns out different :o
bretm
Oct 24, 10:10 PM
I don't understand the huge mess part of your comment. You can always display things at a size that is comfortable for you. It was when screen resolution was fixed that everything was a huge mess.
With fixed resolution a designer never knew if his product was going to be displayed at 640X480, 800x600, 1280x1024, widescreen, etc. etc. Now a designer can design at a suitable resolution and the user can scale to a size that is pratical for them.
It is a good thing people. Don't worry.
Ah, but YOU'RE missing the point completely. As resolutions inscrease the interface can scale up because it is resolution independent in 10.5. Web pages are NOT resolution independent for the most part. Photos, graphics, interfaces are not. So, when you're looking at your killter 3000x2000 monitor yes your icons and OS interface can scale up and your photos will look very crisp BECAUSE they are vector or have extra resolution to draw from. Websites on the other hand will be fixed at 800x600 or whatever and unless you want them to be miniscule on your screen as they are shown pixel for pixel, they will have to be blown up in some way.
So the res independence IS a good thing and just fine UNTIL the monitor resolutions go through the roof for the same physical screen sizes.
There are too many things outthere that are desinged WITHOUT the independence. Icons inside nearly every application for example. All kinds of stuff. My guess is that this won't affect too much too quickly. It just addresses some issues with the current interface on high screen monitors.
With fixed resolution a designer never knew if his product was going to be displayed at 640X480, 800x600, 1280x1024, widescreen, etc. etc. Now a designer can design at a suitable resolution and the user can scale to a size that is pratical for them.
It is a good thing people. Don't worry.
Ah, but YOU'RE missing the point completely. As resolutions inscrease the interface can scale up because it is resolution independent in 10.5. Web pages are NOT resolution independent for the most part. Photos, graphics, interfaces are not. So, when you're looking at your killter 3000x2000 monitor yes your icons and OS interface can scale up and your photos will look very crisp BECAUSE they are vector or have extra resolution to draw from. Websites on the other hand will be fixed at 800x600 or whatever and unless you want them to be miniscule on your screen as they are shown pixel for pixel, they will have to be blown up in some way.
So the res independence IS a good thing and just fine UNTIL the monitor resolutions go through the roof for the same physical screen sizes.
There are too many things outthere that are desinged WITHOUT the independence. Icons inside nearly every application for example. All kinds of stuff. My guess is that this won't affect too much too quickly. It just addresses some issues with the current interface on high screen monitors.
Shrink
May 1, 05:30 AM
Necessary information: I have a MacBook 13�. It is on A/C power virtually all the time. (I calibrate the battery once a month, every month) When I go to bed, I do a shut down. During the day, after use I put it to sleep until I need it again. This sleep�wake cycle occurs about 10 to 12 times a day.
I have been advised that it is �better the computer� to go into Preferences>Energy Saver and set sleep to �never�, as battery conservation is not an issue (alway on A/C power). Also to set the screen to shut down in approximately 10 min.
Which is �better for the computer��to put it to sleep after each use, or to leave it running all the time until bedtime shut down.
Thanks for your advice�
I have been advised that it is �better the computer� to go into Preferences>Energy Saver and set sleep to �never�, as battery conservation is not an issue (alway on A/C power). Also to set the screen to shut down in approximately 10 min.
Which is �better for the computer��to put it to sleep after each use, or to leave it running all the time until bedtime shut down.
Thanks for your advice�
JohnnyQuest
Jan 23, 06:38 PM
I have a 16GB iPod touch (1.1.3 with apps, Incase black protective cover, Power Support anti-glare protector) and would like to trade for an unopened 8GB iPhone. I have the original box and all the stuff it came with. There are NO MAJOR scratches on the back, just normal ones from my iPod sock. The screen has no issues nor scratches. It's been used since Christmas day, but looks new.
sreedy
Sep 22, 04:53 AM
So that means it's Higher & Further Education only?
DTMfan
May 4, 10:24 AM
I'm about to purchase the new '11 iMac in the next couple days and had a question about Time Machine. I have all my backups from my '09 iMac on my external harddrive. Will Time Machine move programs like iWorks? I don't want to have to buy the program all over again on the new computer if Time Machine can transfer it. Same for Adobe Photoshop CS5..does Time Machine allow these programs to be transferred? Thanks for any and all help!
savanahrose
Nov 17, 09:26 AM
its a shame there isnt a reseller/retail store here in charleston aka chucktown.... in the sea of retailers on king street, apple is nowhere to be found.
Laird Knox
Mar 7, 03:23 PM
Browsers are evil. More time can be spent "fixing" inconsistencies than actually designing the page. I normally use FireBug to step through page blocks and examine CSS. I've seen IE choke on something as simple as a missed semicolon.
A guess right off the top is that it might be something with the box model. IE tends to interpret things a little differently so check your margins and padding closely. If that fails you might want to start with a blank page and add in components until the page breaks.
By the way: It displays OK in IE8.
A guess right off the top is that it might be something with the box model. IE tends to interpret things a little differently so check your margins and padding closely. If that fails you might want to start with a blank page and add in components until the page breaks.
By the way: It displays OK in IE8.
medea
Oct 7, 10:41 PM
Id say it depends on what kind of stereos they will introduce, if it's a shelf system then maybe around $400-650, for components even more, but I doubt it will go for $2000.
Powerbook G5
Mar 9, 09:09 PM
I am not seeing it, I'd check to see if your browser's text settings are set to bold or italicize text somehow.
Jest3r
Mar 7, 05:07 PM
I'll be there around 3:00ish, pending I'm in town...
phas3
May 3, 12:59 AM
what about using a display will my macbook run sluggish because the display will be higher in resolution and the GPU will have to work more?
No comments:
Post a Comment